Vendor catalogs sell Semax, Selank, Dihexa, and Noopept as a nootropic set. They are four different molecules. They do not share a receptor. They do not share a clinical evidence base.
This page stays with verified PubMed papers. It does not rank "which is strongest." It does not publish a protocol.
Research notice: These compounds are discussed for laboratory and literature comparison only. They are not approved for human consumption, medical treatment, or diagnosis in the United States based on the sources cited here.
| Parameter | Semax | Selank | Dihexa | Noopept (GVS-111) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence / class | Met-Glu-His-Phe-Pro-Gly-Pro; ACTH(4-10) analog | Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg-Pro-Gly-Pro; tuftsin analog | N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6) aminohexanoic amide; angiotensin IV analog | N-phenylacetyl-L-prolylglycine ethyl ester |
| Lead published mechanism | BDNF/trkB in rat hippocampus and basal forebrain | Plasma enkephalin-degrading enzyme inhibition; GABAergic gene-expression changes in a cell line | HGF/c-Met (rodent/cell); McCoy 2013 has a 2021 JPET notice of concern | NGF/BDNF mRNA in rat hippocampus; photochemical-stroke neuroprotection in rats |
| Human papers cited here | Russian stroke and cerebrovascular-insufficiency reports | Russian GAD / anxiety comparisons | None | Russian comparison versus piracetam in organic brain disease |
| FDA-approved US product | No, in sources cited | No, in sources cited | No, in sources cited | No, in sources cited |
Vendor "P21" is not a fourth column. PubMed indexes a CNTF-derived tetrapeptide P021 (Ac-DGGL(A)G-NH2). That literature is summarized separately. A research vial labeled P21 is not verified as P021.
Semax is a heptapeptide analog of ACTH(4-10): Met-Glu-His-Phe-Pro-Gly-Pro.
Dolotov et al. (J Neurochem, 2006) found specific, reversible, calcium-dependent binding of tritiated Semax in rat basal-forebrain membranes (Kd 2.4 ± 1.0 nM; Bmax 33.5 ± 7.9 fmol/mg protein). Intranasal Semax in rats raised BDNF protein at 3 hours in basal forebrain, not cerebellum.
Dolotov et al. (Brain Res, 2006) reported that a single application in rats produced a maximal 1.4-fold increase in hippocampal BDNF protein, a 1.6-fold increase in trkB tyrosine phosphorylation, and 3-fold / 2-fold increases in exon III BDNF and trkB mRNA, with more conditioned-avoidance reactions. The authors proposed that cognitive effects involve the hippocampal BDNF/trkB system. Those are rodent findings. They are not a human BDNF claim.
Indexed clinical papers exist in Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova: Gusev, Skvortsova, Chukanova (2005) on cerebrovascular insufficiency; Gusev, Martynov, Kostenko et al. (2018) on ischemic stroke (PubMed title contains the journal's spelling "tretament"); Miasoedova, Skvortsova, Nasonov et al. (1999) on mechanisms in the acute period of ischemic stroke. Those papers document a clinical research program. This page does not extract numeric efficacy claims from them beyond what the indexed titles support in English, and it does not convert them into a treatment recommendation.
Pairwise chemistry versus Selank: Selank vs Semax.
Selank is a heptapeptide analog of tuftsin: Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg-Pro-Gly-Pro.
Zozulya et al. (2001) reported that Selank inhibited enzymatic hydrolysis of plasma enkephalin (IC50 15 micromolar) and was more potent than bacitracin and puromycin in that assay. Filatova et al. (2017) reported that Selank, GABA, and olanzapine affected expression of genes involved in GABAergic neurotransmission in IMR-32 cells. Do not upgrade those findings to "Selank is a benzodiazepine."
Zozulia, Neznamov, Siuniakov et al. (2008) compared Selank with medazepam in generalized anxiety and neurasthenia (62 patients: 30 Selank, 32 medazepam). Anxiolytic effects were described as similar; Selank was also described as having antiasthenic and psychostimulant effects. Medvedev, Tereshchenko, Israelian et al. (2014) compared Selank with phenazepam in 60 patients with phobic-anxiety and somatoform disorders. Those are published clinical comparisons in a Russian journal. They are not FDA trials.
Dihexa is N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6) aminohexanoic amide, a metabolically stabilized angiotensin IV analog from the Wright/Harding group at Washington State.
McCoy et al. (2013) reported that dihexa reversed scopolamine-induced deficits in Morris water maze performance, showed synaptogenic activity, and was orally active in the scopolamine and aged-rat models they used. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics published a notice of concern on that paper in 2021 (PMID 34551989). This page cites the paper and the notice. It does not treat McCoy 2013 as settled human evidence.
Benoist et al. (2014) reported that the procognitive and synaptogenic effects of angiotensin IV-derived peptides, including this series, depend on activation of the hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met system. Wright and Harding (2015) reviewed HGF/c-Met as an Alzheimer-disease target. Those are rodent, cell, and review sources. No verified human dihexa RCT is in the sources below.
This site does not currently have a dihexa peptide page.
Noopept is N-phenylacetyl-L-prolylglycine ethyl ester, also called GVS-111. Gudasheva et al. (1997) identified cyclo-L-prolylglycine as the major metabolite in rat brain. Ostrovskaya et al. (2001) reported that the dipeptide retained nootropic activity after oral administration in rat avoidance tasks.
Ostrovskaya, Romanova, Barskov et al. (1999) reported memory-restoring and neuroprotective effects in a photochemical stroke model in rats, including a smaller infarct volume. Ostrovskaya, Gudasheva, Zaplina et al. (2008) reported that Noopept increased NGF and BDNF mRNA expression in rat hippocampus after acute administration; chronic treatment (28 days) did not produce tolerance in that readout and further increased the hippocampal neurotrophic effect. Cortical NGF/BDNF mRNA was below control after a single dose and only slightly increased BDNF after chronic treatment.
Neznamov and Teleshova published a comparison of Noopept and piracetam in patients with mild cognitive disorders of vascular and traumatic origin (2008 Russian-language paper; 2009 English translation in Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology). That is a published clinical comparison. It is not an FDA trial, and this page does not convert it into a use instruction.
This site does not currently have a Noopept peptide page.
Kazim, Blanchard, Dai et al. (2014) studied chronic oral treatment with a CNTF-derived peptidergic compound, P021 (Ac-DGGL(A)G-NH2), in 3xTg-AD mice. They reported effects on amyloid pathology, cognition, neurogenesis, and synaptic plasticity in that model. Baazaoui and Iqbal (2017) reported that P021 in the diet from 3 to 21 months prevented dendritic and synaptic deficits and reversed cognitive impairment in 3xTg-AD mice.
PubMed indexes P021. It does not, in the sources cited here, index a unique approved drug named P21. Vendor listings that say "P21" may or may not match Ac-DGGL(A)G-NH2. This page cannot certify a vial.
Related: Selank vs Semax. Category hub: nootropic and mood peptides.
Peptide calculator
Peptide reconstitution protocol
Nootropic peptides (category guide)